Pages

Saturday 17 May 2014

Fashionable Disorder

Fashion is something that has changed ever since Adam and Eve were shocked by their nudity right back when. For example, Crocs and Uggs were once a thing, right? I'm also under the impression we will one day look back at our library of Facebook pictures, cringe and claim we had no idea what we were thinking when we wore that. So fashion changes, but a while ago Twitter was hit with images of Urban Outfitters latest trend alongside their infamous 'Eat Less' Tshirt, a positively negative reaction towards this 'statement piece', I'm sure you will all agree.
photo taken from living.msn.com
Urban Outfitters pulled their 'Eat Less' Tshirt back in 2010 and have since pulled other items such as shot glasses and flasks in the style of prescription medicine bottles and 'Syringe Shot Shooters', complete with embarrassing apologies across social media sites. 

photo taken from Telegraph.co.uk
Perhaps showing they haven't quite learnt their lesson, this newest trend shows a tshirt black printed with the word 'depression' over and over - because depression is like, so cool. This has also been pulled, for a second time I might add, though the store claimed they were supporting an independant label under the name 'Depression.' How humble of you, UO. The question is, who chooses these pieces? Designs them? Buys them, even? And why do they keep appearing on the shelves when they will inevitably have to clear them again just weeks later? It goes without saying that mental illness needs to stop being glamourised by the media and the idea of it being a fashion item is only more disgusting.  UO has had a history with displaying offensive content on their website including slogans aimed at the Irish's love for drinking, their colour choice of 'Obama/Black' and pictures of Hailey Clauston in compromising positions, who was 15 at the time. Whoops. There are countless articles on their top most offensive and controversial pieces of clothing that they recieve endless complaints about and have to remove from their stores. I just don't understand why they're stocked in the first place and who thinks it's a good idea to produce these products.


photo taken from living.msn.com
However, there is one thing I have to say I admire Urban Outfitters for displaying on their site; two female models kissing because God forbid they would use a heterosexual couple to display their garments to the world. Inevitably, this also recieved complaints but I think that it's a movement in the right direction. If they're wanting to be controversial and create a frenzy over something, I think that's the right thing to choose. In a world where it's becoming more and more expected, why not? So I respect that, more companies should do that. Well, that and the sheer audacity to excessively overcharge their customers. 

6 comments:

  1. Ugh that depression top is so thoughtless.
    Who would buy that let alone design it?
    | | Dreams Of New York | |

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. my thoughts exactly! can't believe it makes it to the shelves

      Delete
  2. urgh... Urban Outfitters...WHAT ARE YOU THINKING. Can't imagine what the designers were thinking...and can't imagine the PR wreck they had to go through...
    ­­Addicted to Makeup

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i know! really not worth the hassle, can't believe they even put it on the shelves!

      Delete
  3. I don't understand UO, I think they're so cringe...they try SO hard to be cool and hipster. I don't know who the buyers for the store are, they keep making such stupid mistakes. x

    Josie’s Journal

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I know I don't know how they can continue to keep buying this stuff and think it won't offend people when it has so many times before!

      Delete